Research Agenda
“How do institutional frictions and social norms distort the allocation of human capital and its value returns?”
Through an economic lens, I analyze women’s existential challenges and development choices across different life stages.
To address this question, my work builds upon a theoretical triad combining New Institutional Economics, Identity Economics, and Narrative Economics. I examine how formal institutional frictions and informal social norms—interwoven with social identities and cultural narratives—generate structural barriers in labor markets, organizational hierarchies, and individual decision-making.
Core Dimensions
I organize my observational and empirical inquiry across three central dimensions:
1. 🔍 Missing (Human Capital Paradox)
- Workforce Exit & Invisibility: Tracing how macro-institutional shifts, market barriers, and privatized caregiving burdens drive female workforce exit, rendering educated talent unobserved in formal markets.
- The Exit Mechanism: Opening the “black box of exit” to disentangle voluntary unpaid caregiving investments from structural workplace exclusion and motherhood penalties.
2. ⚖️ Misallocation (Distorted Incentives & Value Returns)
- Talent & Credit Sorting: Evaluating how task assignment biases (Greedy vs. Glue work), credit expropriation (Matilda Effect), and cross-market penalties distort talent sorting, effort incentives, and value returns.
- Aggregate Efficiency Losses: Quantifying aggregate productivity and welfare losses when institutional frictions and social prejudices prevent optimal talent allocation.
3. 📜 Social Norms (Informal Constraints & Narratives)
- Informal Institutional Constraints: Unpacking how cultural expectations, gender role definitions, and internalized identities constrain individual choices and household bargaining.
- Narrative Transmission: Investigating the mechanisms through which social norms and economic narratives reinforce persistent disparities in market outcomes.
Selected Research Projects
Ongoing Projects
-
Gender and Academic Credit Allocation
[Work in Progress](Jan. 2026 – Present)
Examining asymmetric credit attribution in mixed-gender co-authored papers—specifically testing whether the scientific community systematically over-attributes research contributions to male co-authors while under-crediting female co-authors in team production. -
Whose Economics? Gender Balance, Perspective Complementarity, and Knowledge Production in Top-Tier Economics
[Research Proposal]
Examining how gender representation and perspective complementarity among authors shape topic selection, research methodologies, and paradigm shifts in top-tier economics journals.